So what is this all about really? Are all these so-called “revolutions” in the Middle East, which are being touted as “spontaneous”, part of the globalist’s Mediterranean Union Agenda. It seems plausible considering the fact that the leaders of the U.S., France, Great Britain, Germany, etc., could care less about the rebels. Anyone that believes that b.s. needs their head examined.
When I read Hillary’s statements I almost fell out of my seat. I don’t know why because it should not really be that surprising. People, about right now, should be having little lights going off in their heads, realizing that once again the American people are being led into another invasion (I would call it a war but it does not qualify).
It’s beginning to look a lot like Iraq. And to think these people have the audacity to declare air space over another country a “no-fly” zone and then declare that bombing them would be a requirement of such a no-fly zone. Imagine for a minute that a foreign nation declared that the airspace above the U.S. was a No-Fly zone, and then once established proceeded to bomb the United States.
“A no-fly zone requires certain actions taken to protect the planes and the pilots, including bombing targets like the Libyan defense systems,” Clinton said as she neared the end of a Middle East trip dominated by worries about Libya, where a rebel offensive is apparently flagging.
She also promised aid to Tunisia in the form of investment credits, loan guarantees, and insurance, all of which help Wall Street banksters.
As I was writing this the UN approved the No-fly zone. See: UN approves no-fly zone over Libya
This is all being peddled in the guise of protecting the protesters, although nobody in the United States or in any of the countries that were originally pushing this (France, Great Britain, etc) have mentioned any such aid to the protesters in Bahrain, where the police have been shooting them. By now I would hope people are suspicious of this entire “Revolution”.
The American people are very clear that they do not want anymore involvement in the globalist’s agenda in regards to the Middle East. Ten years after 9/11 and the people realize that they were lied to about all these Middle East invasions. But the globalist’s continue unchecked to do whatever they want. But they are becoming more and more exposed for the frauds and liars that they are:
Read the comments at the article mentioned above: UN approves no-fly zone over Libya
So this brings us back to why? The answer may have to do with the Mediterranean Union that has been considered a failure to date. The first nations that were calling for the no-fly zone were France and Great Britain. France’s Sarkozy has been a vocal advocate of such a union.:
Justifying NATO Military Intervention To fullfill Mediterranean Union Agenda
Doug Owen - Blacklisted News
To understand why Western powers are pushing so hard to launch military operations against Libya, why now David Cameron is backing Sarkozy’d calls for Libya air strikes, and why the US now says “NATO is the ‘natural choice’ for Libya intervention, you have to look at the failed Mediterranean Union.
Wikipedia gives a good general overview:
The Union for the Mediterranean (UfM) is a multilateral partnership that encompasses 43 countries from Europe and the Mediterranean Basin: the 27 member states of the European Union and 16 Mediterranean partner countries from North Africa, the Middle East and the Balkans. It was created in July 2008 as a relaunched Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (the Barcelona Process) in 2008, when a plan to create an autonomous Mediterranean Union was dropped. The Union has the aim of promoting stability and prosperity throughout the Mediterranean region. Nevertheless, its 2009 and 2010 Summits could not be held due to the stalemate of the Arab-Israeli peace process after the Gaza war.
The Union for the Mediterranean introduced new institutions into the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership with the aim of increasing its visibility such as the creation of a Secretariat.
…
A proposal to establish a “Mediterranean Union” was part of the election campaign of Nicolas Sarkozy during the French presidential election campaign in 2007. During the campaign Mr. Sarkozy said that the Mediterranean Union would be modeled on the European Union with a shared judicial area and common institutions.[19] Sarkozy saw Turkish membership of the Mediterranean Union as an alternative to membership of the European Union, which he opposes,[19] and as a forum for dialog between Israel and its Arab Neighbors.[20]
Sarkozy’s Mediterranean Union failed through diplomacy and other general setbacks, though institutions like the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership developed the framework for the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly and region.
FT’s Gideon Rachman’s “ineffectual international organizations” highlights the struggle of this New World Order and how these systems of global governance have been ineffectual in being able to align competing interests and push through policy changes in such a diverse forums. The CFR’s Lee Hudson Teslik’s “A Mediterranean Rendezvous” states; “The union’s formation also raises a more basic question—what exactly is gained by founding a new bloc? The Economist, in a recent cover story, says global institutions have devolved into an “outdated muddle.” Clubs—whether regional (ASEAN, EU, AU, SAARC), cultural/linguistic (Arab League, OIC), economic (IMF, World Bank), trade focused (Mercosur, OPEC, or, more broadly, the WTO), or military/security focused (NATO, SCO, OSCE), not to mention the bewildering array of “G” clubs (G7, G8, G11, G20, G33)—have proliferated in recent decades. Yet the result, the Economist says, has not necessarily been better governance. The FT’s Gideon Rachman parodies “ineffectual international organizations” in a recent blog post, saying they often speak grandiosely on issues they have no power to influence. None of this minimizes the pressing issues faced by Mediterranean countries. It will be a feat, however, if Sarkozy is able to align competing interests and push through policy change in such a diverse forum.”
Western foreign policy, geopolitics and systems of governance have not been able to produce the results that the globalists desire. It should be no surprise that France is the first country to recognize rebel forces as legitimate government. According to an AP report, “French diplomatic source insisted that “alongside Britain, we are working on what could be done without NATO. The sight of the NATO flag (in Libya) would be provocative.” There are some legal issues that remain, an official speaking for US Defense said “Certain activities,” would require a United Nations Security Council resolution, “but what we need is a clear and proper legal basis.”
The African Union also rejected “any form of foreign military intervention” in Libya. “The council reaffirmed its firm commitment to the respect of the unity and territorial integrity of Libya,” said Ramtane Lamamra, commissioner of AU’s Peace and Security Council. The announcements came after NATO ministers decided Thursday to move warships to the central Mediterranean, but failed to reach an agreement on the imposition of a no-fly zone over Libya.
BBC notes, “Col Gaddafi’s extensive business interests in Europe have made this a tricky crisis for the EU to navigate. The Libyan Investment Authority (LIA), a huge sovereign wealth fund, has many assets in Europe, including a stake in Italy’s Juventus football club.In 2010 Libya provided about 13% of Italy’s total gas imports, the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) reports. The ECFR, a leading think-tank, says Libya is even more important as a supplier of crude oil. Its biggest EU customers are Italy (22% of Italy’s oil imports), the Irish Republic (23%), Austria (21%), France (15.7%) and Greece (14.6%).
The European Union and NATO’s response to the events in north Africa with the emergency summit of EU leaders in Brussels tomorrow, makes clear that the EU’s rewriting of its north Africa policy, is to re-design the fullfill the frame work of the Mediterranean Union. Black Listed News